Monthly Archives: March 2014

I’ve been AWOL for about two weeks from blogging. I went “Divergent” so to speak. I traveled to the Washington, D.C. and the Northern Virginia area for my adult “spring break,” visiting old friends from when I once lived there and seeing some sights. It was a really fun trip. To the left is a photo of the National Gallery of Art, where I saw an interesting exhibit, a portrait of American life, from the photos Garry Winogrand took from the 1950s to his death in 1984. Check out the exhibit if you get a chance.

Then after getting back home our dog Stella became ill and had to go to the emergency vet hospital, which turned our world upside down. After 3 1/2 days of care there, it appears luckily she’s going to be okay to our great relief. She had tested positive for exposure to an antifreeze-type of toxin, which we don’t know exactly where she was exposed to, but we are taking all precautions and have taken our car to get checked for any leaks. We are so fortunate to have her back from what was a life-threatening situation. I think my anxiety went through the roof, but we were very lucky and now she’s back home being her regular Lab self. Oh thank goodness!

I did read “Divergent” while flying back and forth from D.C. Surely, Veronica Roth’s 2011 dystopian young-adult novel made for a good airplane/spring-break-kind-of read, even though I’m typically not a frequent YA reader. It’s got action, suspense, a little love story and an easy reading level. (Maybe too easy?) Am I the last one to have read this bestseller? Probably. I plan to see the movie of it soon, but I haven’t seen it just yet. The movie took in $56 million on its opening weekend, which isn’t too shabby but is nowhere near “The Hunger Games” box-office haul.

If I were to compare the “Divergent” book to “The Hunger Games,” I’d have to say that I found Suzanne Collins’s book better written, but I still enjoyed “Divergent” and found it somewhat similar; they both have 16-year-old protagonists who must undergo enormous physical challenges in a post-apocalyptic world. “Divergent’s” premise though seemed rather hokey to me that people were divided into factions based on their predispositions to Candor, Erudite, Dauntless, Abnegation and Amity. On their way to building a utopia it seems the survivors must have forgotten their heads, believing that by separating people by character would solve society’s problems. (Good luck with that.) But what the heck, I was going to go with it.

The book gets good though when Tris goes off to undergo the initiation process for the Dauntless (brave) faction. The dueling cliques that form between the initiates and the training scenes are some of the best, as Tris jumps in and out of trains, hurls down a wire from the top of the old Sears Tower, and goes through exposure therapy and simulations to try to eradicate fears. The training reminded me a bit of the book “Ender’s Game.” Though along the way Tris falls for her trainer, which isn’t in that one.

And of course, she has a secret and isn’t solely Dauntless. The ending is an action page-turner as the Erudite faction tries to violently take control and Tris is one of the few who can stop them. I look forward to seeing how the movie handles the book. One movie critic I read said the movie is “more satisfying than the bestseller that inspired it.” Could it be true? Have you seen it and what did you think?

On top of “Divergent,” I just finished “The Rosie Project,” which is a romantic comedy that I read for my book club. We are going to discuss it on Tuesday, so I will gather my thoughts about it and write more later. I did mostly enjoy “The Rosie Project” and thought it was clever. It’s about a socially-challenged man’s search for the perfect wife. By the time Rosie comes along she’s so wrong according to his criteria but so right for him regardless. The story’s both funny and charming.

What did you think? Have you read this one? Continue reading →

Well the polar vortex ended last Friday and a glimpse of spring has arrived today in western Canada with 55 degree weather. That translates into Miami temps for this time of year here. We’re loving it for sure!

I’ve been meandering a bit with my reading, but just finished Ann Patchett’s nonfiction book of essays called “This Is the Story of a Happy Marriage,” which came out last November. My sister gave it to me for Christmas. I love the title; it makes you want to know if she’s being real, or if she has some secret cornucopia of knowledge about marriage. I was sure I would devour the collection in no time at all, but I’ve been enjoying it this past week more slowly like a glass of fine wine. I find there seems to be more to absorb in nonfiction and it takes me a bit longer than a novel to get through, generally speaking.

But I liked reading it slowly as it’s a great book and I would highly recommend it, especially to people who are interested in writing, or in the aspects of a writer’s life. It’s quite personal and the combined 22 essays flow together almost as if you were reading a memoir. There’s chapters on just about every facet of Patchett’s life including her childhood and family, how she became a successful writer and co-bookstore owner, her divorce and eventual second marriage, and her life in Nashville. It’s all there: her loves, losses and how writing has always been her mission in life, which she’s worked very hard at doing both as a journalist and as a novelist.

The way she writes these essays it’s almost as if you know her and she’s telling you like she would a friend, candidly and confiding. She’s often funny and self-effacing. The essays are a genuine treat to read, her descriptions and observations reveal truths about life in various episodes. I was lured into them eagerly like a bee to a bonnet. It made me wonder if Patchett’s actually a better nonfiction writer than she is a novelist. This collection made me think so. Granted, I have read just two of her novels so far, one of which “State of Wonder” I liked quite a bit; the other “Run” I didn’t care for that much. But I’d like to read her novel “Bel Canto,” which I’ve heard is her very best.

Meanwhile this nonfiction collection knocked it out of the park for me. I especially appreciated her essay “The Getaway Car,” which gives useful advice if you’re interested in writing, and a candid perspective on being a writer. I also found interesting her foray into becoming a bookstore co-owner, which she writes about in “The Bookstore Strikes Back.” And the title essay “This Is the Story of a Happy Marriage” about the long road to love she found with her second husband is a poignant piece that might remind one that sometimes you don’t realize the really good thing or person you’ve got till they’re (almost) gone.

I enjoyed about all of the essays in this book. She even writes about her very dear dog Rose in “This Dog’s Life” and “Dog Without End,” which made me happy being such a dog lover. I guess only one essay “The Mercies” about the former Catholic nuns who taught her school and befriended her I found a bit convoluted and didn’t draw me in as much as the others. But on the whole, I was quite taken with this volume and will keep it to reread pieces again in the future.

What about you — have you read this book or others by her? Or do you plan to? Continue reading →