The Girl Who Played With Fire

The past two summers I’ve read one book from Stieg Larsson’s best-selling trilogy. And I must say, they do make good page-turning summer reads. This second one is focused much more on Lisbeth Salander, the computer hacker tough girl who helped journalist Mikael Bloomkvist crack the crimes in the first book. From that, she’s gotten rich off the Wennerstrom money and goes traveling around the world without telling anyone she knows. She even gets a boob job in Italy (in the book). But finds herself in trouble almost as soon as she returns to Stockholm — when her fingerprints are found on the gun at a multiple murder scene, leading her to go into hiding to figure out who’s behind it.

“The Girl Who Played With Fire” unlocks secrets behind Salander’s abusive childhood and how she came to be institutionalized for awhile. The murders, with a connection to Blomqvist’s Millennium magazine, deal with a loathsome gang of drug- and sex-traffickers. Like “Dragon Tattoo,” this book dwells on men’s violence toward women, which leads many readers to question is the sexual violence of these books just titillation and misogyny on the part of the author? Or is Salander a kind of feminist avenger? To which I’d say I’m more in the latter camp. Salander seems almost like an antihero superhero in the book, who has problems but confronts the bad guys and deals out justice in gutsy ways.

The Swedish movies follow the books pretty closely and do a good job. But they seem a bit more plodding than the fast-page-turning books. I liked both books almost equally well but perhaps found this one more suspenseful. The ending leaves Salander in a heap of a mess. All the more reason I’ll tune in next summer for the last book “Hornet’s Nest.”

Posted in Books | Leave a comment

The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo

The news this week that actress Rooney Mara, at far left, has won the role of Lisbeth Salander in the Hollywood movie version of “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” is a tad mind-boggling since no one much has heard of her work, unless you saw this year’s version of “A Nightmare on Elm Street.” Apparently the director of “Dragon Tattoo” met her during the upcoming movie about Facebook and says she’s great. After reading two of the books in Stieg Larsson’s triology, I have to say Rooney Mara doesn’t exactly come to mind as playing the whip-smart, computer hacker ruffian that is the heroin Lisbeth Salander. I’ve seen the Swedish movie version of “Dragon” and actress Noomi Rapace, above right, comes across as highly believable. I couldn’t believe how much Rapace seemed to embody the tough Salander. Will Rooney Mara be able to transform? Or is the U.S. version just going to be a cotton-candy adaptation of the book?

Remember there was a time when author Anne Rice was livid that Tom Cruise got the part of Lestat in 1994’s “Interview With the Vampire.” She said he was obviously “no” Lestat. But apparently after seeing the movie, Rice changed her mind and thought Tom was great with ole Brad Pitt as Louis. Perhaps she was just rolling with the publicity machine. But perhaps an open mind should be kept with Rooney as Salander. Sigh. If only it were that easy.

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

Eat, Pray, Love

Maybe it seems a bit surprising that “The Expendables” ($35 million) beat out “Eat, Pray, Love” ($23.7 million) this past weekend at the box office – just because the place was packed to the gills even a half hour before the show. Gosh weren’t there more chicks there than Lilith Fair? And besides how many weeks was Elizabeth Gilbert’s 2006 memoir on the bestseller list anyways …. like forever? I mean Sly’s “Expendables” looks from clips rather expendable, doesn’t it? Bunch of action-guy old farts. Sure, give me the animated “Super Friends” any day; you know, Aqua Man, Wonder Woman, Superman, Batman and Robin etc. (Especially Aqua …) But Sly, Arnold and Willis? — oh I’ll take a pass.

Anyways, “Eat, Pray, Love” was not really a painful affair, guys. It was quite entertaining to a point. I sat in an aisle where a number of women were heard to say they had read part of the book but not the whole (whiny) thing. I had read part of it too and I really did mean to finish it. Anyways, Julia Roberts does a good job as “Liz,” and the cinematography of Italy, India and Bali were quite fetching. I guess I liked Italy and India but started to tire around the Bali part. Perhaps, I admit, James Franco early in the pic did more for me than Javier Bardem near the end; I know that’s not the popularly held view among women in the age group of the book’s fanbase, but it’s sort of true. After all there’s good reason the young-ish Franco was on “General Hospital” and why Sean Penn kissed him in “Milk.” Think about it.

Anyways, the “E, P, L” soundtrack is a pleasant surprise. Two Neil Young songs! Two Eddie Vedder songs! One Sly and the Family Stone, and one Marvin Gaye! When you hear “Heart of Gold” come on during the movie – it’s just awesome.

I know some critics have clobbered “E, P, L” for being whiny, priviledged, soft, simplistic, self-absorbed etc. Peter Travers of Rolling Stone called it “torture” to watch. I could think of other movies much more tortuous. I’m sure it wasn’t as full a picture or as witty as the book. But the movie followed the remnants: a women’s journey after her painful divorce. Like the book, I found some authentic substance and some good chick flick escapism to it.

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

Inception

Inception is definitely the blockbuster action thriller of the summer, and is raking in at the box office, especially with the Gen X’ers etc. It’s built around the clever plot of an undercover gang who wire themselves up to people sleeping in order to get into their unconscious minds (their dream space) to extract and plant information. The movie looks and plays out pretty cool and the visual effects are great. Leo DiCaprio, and especially Marion Cotillard, are effective as the married couple in dream limbo.

It’s quite an involving, semi-complicated movie, where paying careful attention helps, while you try and figure out what’s going on. It’s not That difficult, but it keeps you working at it. I was trying to listen intently but found some of the dialogue drowned out by the pounding background music. And half way in, I started to daydream about my stay at the beach and what else I had to do, and sooner or later I realized I wasn’t concentrating about the movie anymore, and had missed a couple of scenes. But the movie goes on for so long, it doesn’t seem to matter. The pounding continues! And the ending and dream finally, finally come around. Awake, I say, let me out of here.

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

Lilith Fair in Calgary

I caught the last four acts of Lilith Fair tonight at McMahon Stadium, the kickoff of the new Tour, the first since it was discontinued after 1999. Erykah Badu, Sheryl Crow, Sugarland and Sarah McLachlan put on a great show! Here is the set list from Sheryl and Sarah.

Sheryl :

Our Love Is Fading *(new album)
Every Day Is a Winding Road
Can’t Cry Anymore
Strong Enough to Be My Man
Favorite Mistake
First Cut Is the Deepest
Summer Day *(new album)
Sign Your Name Across My Heart (cover of Terence Trent D’Arby)
If It Makes You Happy
Soak Up the Sun

Sarah :

Angel
Loving You Is Easy
Building a Mystery
Stupid
World on Fire
I Will Remember You
Really Happy * (new album)
Adia
Possession
Sweet Surrender
Your Love Is Better Than Ice Cream

Posted in Music | Leave a comment

Splice

So what did I think I’d get out of it “Splice” — the movie about a biotech experiment gone awry? Was it that I thought this lab-manufactured creature was good for a summer scare? Or that it would be an escape from everything on the mind?

True, I don’t normally see many of these kinds of flicks. But my spouse helped narrow it down among choices and I thought it might be fun to be scared with some alien type creature or a test-tube deviant. The local newspaper gave it 4 out of 5 stars. I repeat 4 out of 5 stars. And after all, hadn’t I seen and liked the sci-fi movie “District 9” with the prawn-like creatures forced to live in slum conditions on Earth? I could handle seeing the prawns!

I was aware too that the talented Canadian actress/director Sarah Polley was in “Splice”; she had been heralded as far back as 1997 for her performance in “The Sweet Hereafter” and even directed Julie Christie(!) in 2006’s “Away From Her” (yes that Julie, the one and only LAR-a from “Docter Zhivago”). Both Polley’s films are sad along with her other tear-jerker film “The Secret Life of Words” with Tim Robbins in 2005. Good luck seeing that without a Kleenex. But alas, what held her to this DNA scare flick? Wasn’t she Oscar material? I didn’t realize Adrian Brody was in it, too. I haven’t been moved by a performance of his since 2002’s “The Pianist.”

But here they both were in “Splice,” playing a scientist couple who go over the bio-ethical line to make a part-human, part-creature species in the race to solve diseases. They and viewers should know better! It’s no use! The scientific egos and calamities! The lab concoction too often than naught goes amiss or falls on the floor. Then all hell breaks loose. Didn’t they see “The Fly” from 1986? … where Jeff Goldbloom grows some mean back hairs and starts to buzz after dabbling around on a science experiment. Apparently they didn’t because Dren, their beloved spliced DNA creature, made in secrecy, sends them a bit over the edge. Dren, Dren, Oh Dren …. !

But this movie lacks opportunities of intrigue and suspense. More disturbing and creepy than truly scary and riveting, “Splice” throws together a little bit of everything: gils, wings, tails, stingers, co-mingling species and biotech companies with nefarious aspirations, even a sequel tie-in; it’s a slippery ride but comes off a bit too loopy without enough spine.

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

The Blind Side

The football movie “The Blind Side” continues to rake in at the box office. At last look, it had passed the $225 million mark and was still going strong, long since its Nov. 20, 2009 release. It’s quite the small-movie phenom of the year, fueled by its amazing and true rags-to-riches story and its evangelical backing. About a big African American kid, one of 12 in his family, whose early years are horrific growing up on the rough side of Memphis, with a crack-addicted mother, and a father he doesn’t know. In and out of foster homes, “Big Mike” is intermittently homeless and sleeping on the couches of acquaintances when he can, one of whom takes him to a private Christian high school, which enrolls him on the athletic coach’s word. On a snowy night, walking back to school in shorts, Mike catches the eye of a rich white family that takes him in and helps him with school and to play football. He comes to play left tackle, protecting the quarterback’s “blind side” with such skill and power, that he draws the attention of college coaches who come clamoring to have him play.

The movie is a feel-good experience, with a wholesome view of the family and life that adopts Mike. Sandra Bullock, as the no nonsense mom who shepherds Mike, and country singer Tim McGraw play the parents. It’s definitely a good, strong character for Bullock, who plays it well. The movie is enjoyable, combining nice family and sports scenes in Mike’s rise out of his circumstances. Though I found it rather sugary, and a bit Disney like, it still is an inspiring a story. It seems Mike is made a bit simplistic in the movie, docile with a low IQ, and parts of the gritty stuff and prejudices seemed airbrushed lightly over. Still the photos of the real people at the end of the movie lend to its strength as a true story; that Mike Oher went on to play offensive tackle this year as a rookie for the Baltimore Ravens is amazing. See this recent New York Times story.

Interesting to note, Oher said he mostly liked the movie but said his character was portrayed as too stupid and his football skills were misrepresented in it though he didn’t elaborate. (He did go on to make the Honor Roll at Ole Miss a couple times.) Oher doesn’t seem to care a lot about the fuss over “Blind Side,” which was based on the 2006 bestselling book by Michael Lewis. Apparently the film’s budget was a mere $29 million, which Sandra Bullock took a pay cut for and agreed instead to receive a percentage of the profits. Seems like a bright idea now.

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

The Road

Of course, I had to see “The Road” because of the intriguing Cormac McCarthy book, which won the Pulitzer Prize in 2006. Most seem to know what it’s about: a father and a son trying to survive after some unknown apocalyptical disaster has gutted civilization. The father and boy are on a road going south to the coast, where presumably they might find more food and have a better chance at survival. But along the way there are roving bands of bad guys the father and boy try to avoid, who take prisoners and eat people to get by. It’s a world reduced to savagery and a food-to-mouth existence, where the boy worries if they are still the “good” guys who won’t resort to cannabalism, and his father assures him that they are, that they’re “carrying the fire.”

The movie is a somber affair. The wife, played by Charlize Theron in flashbacks, decides life post-apocalypse isn’t worth living and does herself in before their journey (no great secret if you’ve read the book). Viggo Mortensen, as the father is looking old and scraggily in this, but is excellent as is the boy played by Kodi Smit-McPhee. The cinematography is especially affecting, with scenes of an ashen, dead landscape, where rotting trees split and fall in deafening crescendo, and broken-into cars and houses are left by the wayside. The area around Mount St. Helens serves as a haunting backdrop to the film’s shots of a post-apocalyptic world.

The movie follows the book to a tee. I was sure they would mess with it, but even the ending is like the book’s. Because of the book, I knew where the scary parts would be. The movie seems much more scary than depressing. God the cannibals! You’ll never want to go down into the cellar again. Why does Viggo do it?!&%! Run for Christ sakes!

The Washington Post and L.A. Times pretty much clobbered the movie (the N.Y. Times a bit less so). The Post’s Ann Hornaday called it a “thin, hopelessly mannered story” — “one long dirge … marking the death of hope and the leaching of all that is bright and good from the world.” The L.A. Times’ Kenneth Turan said it was good at horrifying and depressing us but had little else to offer. I thought it faithful to the book and was a pretty affecting tale, a warning of sorts about nuclear annihilation. It reminded me a little of the 1983 TV event, “The Day After.” It also had redemptive qualities in the bonding of the father and son, and in the overall fight between good and the forces of chaos and evil. The struggle to get to the sea and the ending there are subtle but compelling. It might not be an Oscar contender, but “The Road” is no slouch of a movie.

ps. Watch for Robert Duvall as the old nearly blind man they encounter on the road (barely can tell it’s him), and thankfully Guy Pearce comes in at the end. I can’t help but quote from “The Road” these days in asking, “Are you carrying the fire?”

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo

Just picked up the mass paperback and boy is this a quick read — nearly all-842 pages of it. Now I know what all the fuss was about. Apparently Stieg Larsson was the second bestselling author in the world in 2008 (even though he died in 2004) — thanks to his Swedish “Millennium” trilogy, of which “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” is the first. The trilogy has sold more than 12.5 million copies, and soon enough I’m sure to pick up book number two. I can’t recall being so consumed by a murder mystery, thriller since perhaps Scott Turow’s “Presumed Innocent” in 1987.

“Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” starts out as protagonist Mikael Blomkvist, a middle-age financial journalist and co-owner of Millennium magazine in Stockholm, hits rock bottom when he’s found guilty in court of libel against shady businessman Hans-Erik Wennerstrom, despite the fact that he knows his story is right but can’t prove it. Exhausted by the case, Blomkvist decides to take time off from the magazine, and accepts an offer from industrialist Henrik Vanger to investigate the disappearance of Vanger’s great-niece 40 years ago from the secluded island that the powerful family owns, three hours by train to the north.

On remote Hedeby Island, Blomkvist finds himself in the depths of winter, trying to make sense of a case long grown cold, and a family that is more than a touch unsettling. The backdrop of the place and the frigid landscape are described vividly enough to make frostbite and darkness feel very real. It might conjure up memories of the 1992 Danish murder mystery “Smilla’s Sense of Snow,” which comes to a head on a glaciated island off of Greenland. Brrr.

Simultaneously, “Dragon Tattoo” also delves into the world of Lizbeth Salander, a 24-year-old pierced, tattooed whip-smart computer hacker whom Blomkvist comes to enlist in time to help crack the case. Salander, who at the beginning is on the verge of being institutionalized for behavioral problems, is a hell of a character, prepared to kick ass and take names later. In a grisly scene, she’s been abused by an appointed guardian and takes it into her own hands to wage a heavy payback.

Blomkvist and Salander make a great investigative combo. Getting to know them in the beginning and middle parts of the book are the best, as new evidence surrounding the creepy Vanger family and disappearance slowly start to emerge. The fact that Blomkvist and Salander start sleeping together while on the case, even though she is half his age, adds an element of complexity (though I don’t think I like it for the characters) with Blomkvist still linked to his partner, Erika Berger, at the magazine. The last part of the book seems to get a bit too tidy with almost all of the pieces falling neatly into place, case cracked, and some of the earlier intrigue losing hold. The ending goes on a tad long and isn’t as good as the rest. But still “Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” proves to be the quickest page-turner of the year.

Ps. A Swedish film of “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” came out in 2009 but apparently didn’t get wide release in the States. Catch it if you can.

Posted in Books | Leave a comment

A Perfect Getaway

This is sort of one of those crazy summer movies you go to that’s a bit suspenseful and ridiculous but you can’t help liking the scary action all the same. It’s about a couple who celebrate their honeymoon by backpacking to a remote beach on the island of Kauai. Everything seems fine until they hear from some hikers about a double murder of a newlywed couple back in Honolulu and they consider turning back. But they decide to go on and end up joining another couple along the hike whose weirdness in time makes them question if they’re the murderers. Without giving too much away, things get pretty nutty after that. And the ending, itself, is pretty laughable (not sure it makes a lot of sense). But still the action shots of the two athletic couples on the tropical Kauai are hard not to see through. Actor Steve Zahn is the only one I really recognize of the bunch. The film apparently was shot in Jamaica, Puerto Rico and Kauai, and despite all its murderous villainery, makes you want to go hike the tropics after seeing it.

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment